<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Just test everything&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103</link>
	<description>Trish Khoo&#039;s testing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scary Tester</title>
		<link>http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103&#038;cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Scary Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Hi Rhys, wow you&#039;re right. Looks like you found a bug with Wordpress. :)

Yes, I agree with your value:time ratio. I&#039;m hoping a developer may read this post and realise that there are more scenarios that need testing beyond the immediately obvious. Hopefully that may lead to better instructions than &quot;just test everything&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rhys, wow you&#8217;re right. Looks like you found a bug with WordPress. :)</p>
<p>Yes, I agree with your value:time ratio. I&#8217;m hoping a developer may read this post and realise that there are more scenarios that need testing beyond the immediately obvious. Hopefully that may lead to better instructions than &#8220;just test everything&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103&#038;cpage=1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I guess that&#039;s why it&#039;s all about balancing risk. Testing enough that you can imply with a reasonable degree of certainty that the other scenarios are likely to work. As you keep going with all the possible combinations, the value of testing those new combinations is lessened. Scope is a good thing, but so is observing that Value : Time ratio for test cases. How likely is it that your project has infinite time for testing?

Oh, and it looks like there is an image in your post that is actually linked to a local file on your computer (moz-screenshot.png). Perhaps you found a combination the tool you used to write this post didn&#039;t test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s all about balancing risk. Testing enough that you can imply with a reasonable degree of certainty that the other scenarios are likely to work. As you keep going with all the possible combinations, the value of testing those new combinations is lessened. Scope is a good thing, but so is observing that Value : Time ratio for test cases. How likely is it that your project has infinite time for testing?</p>
<p>Oh, and it looks like there is an image in your post that is actually linked to a local file on your computer (moz-screenshot.png). Perhaps you found a combination the tool you used to write this post didn&#8217;t test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hunter</title>
		<link>http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=103#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Good points.  Funny thing: I read an inspired suggestion recently by a brilliant blogger about a new test design tool designed to efficiently address exactly these kinds of combinatorial explosions....  :)   

http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=93

- Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  Funny thing: I read an inspired suggestion recently by a brilliant blogger about a new test design tool designed to efficiently address exactly these kinds of combinatorial explosions&#8230;.  :)   </p>
<p><a href="http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=93" rel="nofollow">http://ubertest.hogfish.net/?p=93</a></p>
<p>- Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
